Lecture Handout: https://write.as/sethlazar/
Lecture 1 argues that we are increasingly connected to one another by algorithmic intermediaries—sociotechnical systems such as centralised privately- and publicly-controlled digital platforms and competing decentralised architectures. I call this network of algorithmically-mediated social relations the 'Algorithmic City'. I analyse the intermediary power that governs the Algorithmic City, and contrast it with the extrinsic power exemplified by the state in the physical city. Extrinsic power governs social relations the way a river's banks govern the water; intermediary power operates more like the bonds holding the water molecules together. By constituting the relationships that they mediate, algorithmic intermediaries enable some to exercise power over others, to shape power relations between mediatees, and—over time—to reshape society at large. Sometimes new power relations should simply be eliminated, but algorithmic intermediaries, if governed appropriately, could be crucial to realising egalitarian social relations and collective self-determination in the information age. We must therefore determine whether and how algorithmic intermediary power can be exercised permissibly. I introduce a framework for justifying this power, and show how algorithmic governance raises new challenges for political philosophy concerning the justification of authority, the foundations of procedural legitimacy, and the possibility of justificatory neutrality.
Lecture 1 argues that we are increasingly connected to one another by algorithmic intermediaries—sociotechnical systems such as centralised privately- and publicly-controlled digital platforms and competing decentralised architectures. I call this network of algorithmically-mediated social relations the 'Algorithmic City'. I analyse the intermediary power that governs the Algorithmic City, and contrast it with the extrinsic power exemplified by the state in the physical city. Extrinsic power governs social relations the way a river's banks govern the water; intermediary power operates more like the bonds holding the water molecules together. By constituting the relationships that they mediate, algorithmic intermediaries enable some to exercise power over others, to shape power relations between mediatees, and—over time—to reshape society at large. Sometimes new power relations should simply be eliminated, but algorithmic intermediaries, if governed appropriately, could be crucial to realising egalitarian social relations and collective self-determination in the information age. We must therefore determine whether and how algorithmic intermediary power can be exercised permissibly. I introduce a framework for justifying this power, and show how algorithmic governance raises new challenges for political philosophy concerning the justification of authority, the foundations of procedural legitimacy, and the possibility of justificatory neutrality.
ที่ตีพิมพ์ 1 year ago
แท็กStanford HAI Stanford AI artificial intelligence Published 5 minutes ago #สอนเทรดหุ้น in-option #สอนเทรด binance #สอนเทรด iq option #สอนเทรด forex มือใหม่ #สอนเทรด forex #สอนเทรด forex พื้นฐาน #สอนเทรด bitkub #สอนเทรด in-option #คอร์สเรียน forex ฟรี #คอร์สเรียน binance ฟรี #คอร์สเรียน iq option ฟรี #คอร์สเรียน forex ฟรี #คอร์สเรียน in-option ฟรี #คอร์สเรียน in option ฟรี #คอร์สเรียน inoption ฟรี #inoption #in-option #in-option.me
สื่อถัดไป
สื่อที่เกี่ยวข้อง
เพิ่มเติมจากผู้ใช้รายนี้